The Dialectics of Science and Magnetism

Stanislav V. Ordin*

Received : March 12, 2026 | Published : April 02, 2026

Citation: Stanislav V. Ordin, “The Dialectics of Science and Magnetism,” Journal of Materials Science and Emerging Technologies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2026.

License: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons licence is provided, and any changes made are indicated.

Abstract

The lack of rigor and the resulting ambiguity of the definition of the magnetic fi eld were hidden behind a mathematization borrowed from hydrodynamics. But in both cases, ideological aspects remained unexplained, leading the very existence of the rotor used to a direct contradiction with curie’s theorem. And through maxwell’s electrodynamics, this contradiction was extended into the theory of relativity. Thus, a formal, in-depth combing of the basic experiments underlying the theory of relativity, through modeling and a more rigorous mathematization of the magnetic fi eld, proved insufficient. A refinement upwards, into the realm of the basis that defines the understanding of relativism, was also required. And this view from above gives us not a polished history of persons, but the genesis of scientific ideas.

Keywords: fragmentation of science, contradictions of fragments, paradoxes, the principle of logarithmic relativity, elementary mathematics, relativism.