Journal of Materials Science and Emerging Technologies (ISSN: 3144-0398)
Research Article Volume: 1 & Issue: 2
Journal Menu
- Home
- Aim and Scope
- Author Guidelines
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Current Issue
- Archive
- Journal Contact
Indexed & Abstracted In
Abstract
The development of NANO-technologies follows the path of Feynman’s linear approximation of the element minimization method. With this approach, the construction of artificial structures relied on microscopic (quantum) models. However, the output of such NANO-technologies typically didn’t exactly correspond to the intended outcome, but to a result that required further understanding and further learning. This is why processors require regular updates of the HIOS. The heuristics of this development path for NANO-technologies are close to zero, so NANO-technologies have become mere empiricism. Achieving UNDERSTANDING what and how to do things, and UNDERSTANDING what NANO-technologies actually do, is possible only by considering two fundamental physical aspects that are essential at the NANO-scale:
1. Local Thermodynamic Effects, determined by Prigogine’s Flow Thermodynamics, must be taken into account.
2. It is necessary to consider the experience of “Living Nanotechnology,” which relies not on “dead” Boltzmann statistics, but on statistics with information accumulation and on the fractal construction of Life from below, from fullerenes to minimal fractals and beyond.
And both of these aspects must be considered both at the design stage of the required device’s functionality and in the formation of the NANO-structure itself.
Keywords: dimensional linear approximation, NANO-anomalies, limits of “dead” NANO-technology, fractality. Resonance states.
AUTHOR TESTIMONIALS
Trusted by Researchers
Experiences from authors who have published with SCIVOLVE.
I had a very positive experience working with the Journal of Case Reports and Reviews in Medicine. The publication process was quick and well organized, every step was clearly explained, and the editorial team was always responsive and helpful.
I really enjoyed communicating with the editorial staff. The editorial team provided clear and efficient communication throughout the process. The manuscript submission process was straightforward, and the editorial team made it easy to address the necessary corrections. I appreciated the professional, patient, and supportive approach of the editorial staff, which has encouraged me to consider publishing my future work.
I had an excellent experience publishing my manuscript with the journal. The communication with the editorial team was clear, professional, and efficient throughout the entire publication process. I truly appreciated their support and responsiveness.
The journal team handled the manuscript carefully and maintained clear communication throughout the editorial process. It was a positive experience publishing our research with SCIVOLVE.
From submission to final publication, the process was organized and easy to follow. The editorial communication made the overall experience straightforward and professional.