Neuroscience Insights: Advances in Brain Studies (ISSN: 3071-0138)
Open Access | DOI: 10.64978/NIABS
Journal Menu

Submit Manuscript

Journal Banner
Indexed & Abstracted In

Head Injury and Its Rehabilitation Across All Age Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Physical, Psychological, and Ocular Complications

Jayeshkumar Kanani, Akshitbhai Vipulbhai Virani, Ola Aied Mahmoud Hassan

Received : October 05, 2025 | Published : November 10, 2025

Citation: Kanani J, Virani AV, Hassan OAM. Head Injury and Its Rehabilitation Across All Age Groups: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis of Physical, Psychological, and Ocular Complications. Neurosci Insights Adv Brain Stud. 2025;1(1):1-9. doi: 10.64978/niabs-0102

Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by SCIVOLVE.

License: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons licence is provided, and any changes made are indicated.

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in complex physical, psychological, and ocular complications requiring comprehensive rehabilitation. Age-related differences in neuroplasticity may influence rehabilitation effectiveness, yet systematic evidence comparing outcomes across age groups remains limited.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of interdisciplinary therapy for TBI patients of all ages, with an emphasis on visual-ocular, psychological, and physical consequences.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for studies published between 2014 and 2024 using the following terms: “traumatic brain injury,” “head injury,” “rehabilitation,” “outcomes,” “pediatric,” “adult,” and “elderly.” Inclusion criteria comprised: (1) original research on TBI rehabilitation outcomes; (2) stratification by age group; (3) quantitative outcome measures; and (4) English-language publication. After 1458 articles were checked by two impartial reviewers, 14 of them satisfied the requirements for a comprehensive review. Using random-effects models, a meta-analysis was conducted with results stratified by age group: children under the age of 18, adults between the ages of 18 and 65, and seniors over the age of 65.

Results: Fourteen studies (n=876; comprising 3 randomized controlled trials, 8 cohort studies, and 3 case-control studies) were included in the final analysis. Clear age-related gradients emerged: pediatric patients (<18 years) achieved 95% recovery into the highest functional categories versus 90% for adults (18–65 years) and 28% for elderly patients (>65 years). Pediatric patients showed 40% better school reintegration, while elderly patients demonstrated 18% greater functional gains with integrated care. 42–54% of patients experienced visual-ocular problems; 24% of patients saw an improvement in function with integrated vision rehabilitation. Only 13–25% of individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI, however, received thorough rehabilitation.

Conclusions: One of the main factors influencing TBI rehabilitation results is age. Despite the success of interventions, 40–80% of survivors experience long-term disability, and only 50–57% can resume productive occupations. The findings highlight the necessity of increasing access to interdisciplinary, age-tailored programs while addressing inequities in the systemic delivery of care.

Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, age groups, visual complications, functional outcomes, systematic review, meta-analysis

AUTHOR TESTIMONIALS

Trusted by Researchers

Experiences from authors who have published with SCIVOLVE.

Dr. Dina Veksler

Dr. Dina Veksler

Independent Researcher, USA.

I had a very positive experience working with the Journal of Case Reports and Reviews in Medicine. The publication process was quick and well organized, every step was clearly explained, and the editorial team was always responsive and helpful.

Petro Kondratenko

Prof. Petro O. Kondratenko

Department of General and Applied Physics, Ukraine.

I really enjoyed communicating with the editorial staff. The editorial team provided clear and efficient communication throughout the process. The manuscript submission process was straightforward, and the editorial team made it easy to address the necessary corrections. I appreciated the professional, patient, and supportive approach of the editorial staff, which has encouraged me to consider publishing my future work.

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

General Surgeon, Brazil.

I had an excellent experience publishing my manuscript with the journal. The communication with the editorial team was clear, professional, and efficient throughout the entire publication process. I truly appreciated their support and responsiveness.

Prof. Daniel Morgan

Prof. Daniel Morgan

Engineering & Technology

The journal team handled the manuscript carefully and maintained clear communication throughout the editorial process. It was a positive experience publishing our research with SCIVOLVE.

Dr. Laura Bennett

Laura Bennett

Senior Researcher, Life Sciences

From submission to final publication, the process was organized and easy to follow. The editorial communication made the overall experience straightforward and professional.