Journal of Applied Sciences and Applications in Engineering
Open Access | DOI: 10.64978/JASAE
Journal Menu

Submit Manuscript

Journal Banner
Indexed & Abstracted In
Journal of Applied Sciences and Applications in Engineering

Review Article Volume: 2 & Issue: 2

Ethnomedicinal Plants of India: Advances in Traditional Knowledge, Ethnopharmacology, Therapeutic Validation and Conservation - A Comprehensive Review (2010-2026)

Dr. Savita Singhal*, Dr. Nidhi Chaturvedi

Received : September 02, 2026 | Published : September 24, 2026

Citation: Singhal, S., Chaturvedi, N., (2026). Ethnomedicinal Plants of India: Advances in Traditional Knowledge, Ethnopharmacology, Therapeutic Validation and Conservation - A Comprehensive Review (2010-2026). Journal of Applied Sciences and Applications in Engineering, 2(2), 1–6.

Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by SCIVOLVE.

License: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons licence is provided, and any changes made are indicated.

Abstract

India’s medicinal-plant traditions represent a large and dynamic interface between indigenous knowledge, biodiversity, pharmacology and healthcare. This review critically synthesizes selected peer-reviewed and institutional literature published from 2010 through 2026, with emphasis on Indian ethnomedicinal surveys, quantitative ethnobotany, pharmacological validation, conservation, botanical authentication and emerging research priorities. The period begins with influential quantitative fi eld studies that used informant consensus, use-value and related indices to move beyond purely descriptive inventories, and extends to contemporary systematic reviews integrating phytochemistry, safety, quality control, conservation and evidence translation. Across the literature, leaves are repeatedly prominent in remedy preparation, while gastrointestinal, dermatological, respiratory, metabolic, wound-care and inflammatory indications recur across regions. At the same time, the evidence base remains uneven: traditional-use documentation is abundant, but botanical authentication, standardized extracts, toxicology, mechanistic work and clinical validation are much less consistent. Conservation concerns have intensified because habitat loss, climate stress, destructive harvesting and market demand affect medicinal-plant populations. The review argues for a next-generation framework that links community-led documentation with voucher-backed taxonomy, quantitative ethnobotany, reproducible pharmacology, safety assessment, sustainable cultivation, digital repositories and equitable benefit sharing. Rather than treating ethnomedicine as either folklore or proof of efficacy, the 2010-2026 literature supports its use as a structured source of hypotheses, conservation priorities and culturally grounded healthcare knowledge.

Keywords: Ethnomedicine; ethnobotany; medicinal plants; India; traditional knowledge; ethnopharmacology; phytochemistry; conservation; quantitative ethnobotany; 2010-2026.

AUTHOR TESTIMONIALS

Trusted by Researchers

Experiences from authors who have published with SCIVOLVE.

Dr. Dina Veksler

Dr. Dina Veksler

Independent Researcher, USA.
“

I had a very positive experience working with the Journal of Case Reports and Reviews in Medicine. The publication process was quick and well organized, every step was clearly explained, and the editorial team was always responsive and helpful.

Petro Kondratenko

Prof. Petro O. Kondratenko

Department of General and Applied Physics, Ukraine.
“

I really enjoyed communicating with the editorial staff. The editorial team provided clear and efficient communication throughout the process. The manuscript submission process was straightforward, and the editorial team made it easy to address the necessary corrections. I appreciated the professional, patient, and supportive approach of the editorial staff, which has encouraged me to consider publishing my future work.

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

General Surgeon, Brazil.
“

I had an excellent experience publishing my manuscript with the journal. The communication with the editorial team was clear, professional, and efficient throughout the entire publication process. I truly appreciated their support and responsiveness.

Prof. Daniel Morgan

Prof. Daniel Morgan

Engineering & Technology
“

The journal team handled the manuscript carefully and maintained clear communication throughout the editorial process. It was a positive experience publishing our research with SCIVOLVE.

Dr. Laura Bennett

Laura Bennett

Senior Researcher, Life Sciences
“

From submission to final publication, the process was organized and easy to follow. The editorial communication made the overall experience straightforward and professional.