Earth Science: Environmental Challenges and Solutions
Open Access | DOI: 10.64978/ESECS
Journal Menu

Submit Manuscript

Journal Banner
Indexed & Abstracted In
Earth Science: Environmental Challenges and Solutions

Research Article Volume: 2 & Issue: 2

A Coupled Dynamical-Radiative Framework for Stratospheric Polar Vortex Impacts on Arctic Surface Climate: Dominant Dynamics, Essential Radiative Amplification, and Regional Patterns

Belay Sitotaw Goshu*

Received : July 15, 2026 | Published : August 17, 2026

Citation: Goshu, B.S. (2026) ‘A Coupled Dynamical-Radiative Framework for Stratospheric Polar Vortex Impacts on Arctic Surface Climate: Dominant Dynamics, Essential Radiative Amplifi cation, and Regional Patterns.’ Earth Science: Environmental Challenges and Solutions, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–22.

Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by SCIVOLVE.

License: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons licence is provided, and any changes made are indicated.

Abstract

Background: The stratospheric polar vortex is known to influence Arctic surface climate primarily via dynamical downward propagation of annular mode anomalies. However, observational and modelling evidence increasingly points to an additional radiative pathway involving ozone, water vapour, and clouds.

Purpose: This study quantifies the coupled dynamical–radiative framework, partitioning the surface temperature response to vortex variability into its two components and assessing their interactions, timescales, and regional expressions.

Methods: We combine ERA5, MERRA 2, and JRA 55 re analyses (1980–2023) with satellite products (CERES, MLS, CloudSat) and targeted CAM6 model experiments with specified dynamics and fixed ozone/cloud fi elds. Composite analyses, lagged correlations, and causal network modelling are employed. Findings: The dynamical pathway dominates the first 2–3 weeks (accounting for 60–70% of the surface variance), whiles the radiative pathway dominated by the longwave cloud radiative effect (LWCRE, +14.5 W m⁻²) lags by 2–4 weeks and contributes 30–40%. Weak vortex events generate a total Arctic warming of +1.6 °C (dynamical +1.0 °C, radiative +0.6 °C). Over the Barents Kara Seas the radiative fraction reaches 45%, and over Greenland warming events it is 46%. Observed Arctic winter warming (0.9 °C per decade) is 33% attributable to radiative changes, a fraction projected to increase by 25% by 2050 under SSP5 8.5.

Conclusion: Arctic surface climate cannot be fully understood from dynamics alone; the radiative pathway is essential for explaining the magnitude, persistence, and regional patterns of temperature anomalies. Recommendation: Next generation coupled stratosphere troposphere–radiation models must include interactive ozone chemistry, mixed phase cloud microphysics, and explicit vortex cloud LWCRE diagnostics to improve sub seasonal to seasonal prediction and Arctic climate projections.

Keywords: Stratospheric polar vortex; Arctic surface climate; radiative pathway; cloud radiative effect; dynamical–radiative coupling.

AUTHOR TESTIMONIALS

Trusted by Researchers

Experiences from authors who have published with SCIVOLVE.

Dr. Dina Veksler

Dr. Dina Veksler

Independent Researcher, USA.
“

I had a very positive experience working with the Journal of Case Reports and Reviews in Medicine. The publication process was quick and well organized, every step was clearly explained, and the editorial team was always responsive and helpful.

Petro Kondratenko

Prof. Petro O. Kondratenko

Department of General and Applied Physics, Ukraine.
“

I really enjoyed communicating with the editorial staff. The editorial team provided clear and efficient communication throughout the process. The manuscript submission process was straightforward, and the editorial team made it easy to address the necessary corrections. I appreciated the professional, patient, and supportive approach of the editorial staff, which has encouraged me to consider publishing my future work.

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

General Surgeon, Brazil.
“

I had an excellent experience publishing my manuscript with the journal. The communication with the editorial team was clear, professional, and efficient throughout the entire publication process. I truly appreciated their support and responsiveness.

Raya Raijaleena Brink

Raya Raijaleena Brink

Lawyer, Master of Arts, Educator, Finland.
“

As I pursue a Doctor of Juridical Science degree, I am pleased to have worked with Scivolve Publishers on publishing my article on allergies. In my work to advance women’s human rights and help humanity, it is vital to have publishing opportunities that respect research integrity. From the first contact with the Editorial Manager to the final stage, the process was precise, transparent, and exemplary. Nothing was overpromised, and the handling of sources and references was also excellent. I warmly recommend Scivolve Publishers for their integrity, professionalism, and the respect with which they conduct their work.

Dr. Laura Bennett

Laura Bennett

Senior Researcher, Life Sciences
“

From submission to final publication, the process was organized and easy to follow. The editorial communication made the overall experience straightforward and professional.