Journal of Surgical Practice and Case Reports (ISSN: 3144-0401)
Open Access | DOI: 10.64978/JSPCR
Journal Menu

Submit Manuscript

Journal Banner
Indexed & Abstracted In
Journal of Surgical Practice and Case Reports (ISSN: 3144-0401)

Research Article Volume: 2 & Issue: 2

Prognostic Factors in Severe Post-Traumatic Facial Paralysis:Analysis of Outcomes Following Transmastoid Nerve Decompression

Hajar Boudhar*, I.Tyara, M.lahjaouj, M.loudghiri, W.Bijou, Y.Oukessou, R.L. Abada, S.Rouadi, M.Roubal, M.Mahtar

Received : July 14, 2026 | Published : September 14, 2026

Citation: Boudhar H, Tyara I, lahjaouj M, loudghiri M, Bijou W, Oukessou Y, Abada RL, Rouadi S, Roubal M, Mahtar M. Prognostic Factors in Severe Post-Traumatic Facial Paralysis: Analysis of Outcomes Following Transmastoid Nerve Decompression. J Surg Pract Case Rep. 2026;2(2):1-5.

Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by SCIVOLVE.

License: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons licence is provided, and any changes made are indicated.

Abstract

Introduction: Post-traumatic peripheral facial paralysis is a significant therapeutic challenge in otorhinolaryngology and cervicofacial surgery, predominantly caused by temporal bone fractures from high-energy trauma like road traffic accidents. This study aimed to identify clinical, paraclinical, and intraoperative prognostic factors influencing functional outcomes following transmastoid facial nerve decompression for severe cases.

Materials and Methods: A single-center, retrospective analytical study was conducted over ten years (2014-2023) at a tertiary care hospital. It included 44 consecutive patients with severe post-traumatic facial paralysis (House Brackmann grades 4-6) who underwent transmastoid decompression. Inclusion required CT-confirmed temporal bone fracture and EMG-documented nerve degeneration ≥90%. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, preoperative investigations (audiometry, EMG, CT), intraoperative findings, and 12-month outcomes were analyzed. Patients were stratified into good (HB 1-2) and fair/poor (HB 3-4) outcome groups for prognostic analysis using Chi-square and t-tests (p<0.05 significant).

Results: The cohort was predominantly young males (mean age 27.1 years; 79.5% male). Road traffic accidents were the leading cause (77.3%). The mean delay to surgery was 12.0 ± 7.7 weeks. The most common intraoperative findings were nerve edema (68.2%) and fibrosis (20.5%), primarily in the tympanic segment (84.1%) and geniculate ganglion (63.6%). At 12 months, 54.5% of patients achieved a good outcome (HB 1-2). Univariate analysis identified the type of intraoperative nerve lesion as the sole significant prognostic factor (p=0.009), with fibrosis, granuloma, and ecchymosis predicting worse outcomes. No significant associations were found with age, sex, surgical timing, initial paralysis grade, or fracture type.

Discussion: Our findings confirm the efficacy and safety of transmastoid decompression for severe post-traumatic facial paralysis. The strong association between intraoperative lesion type and functional outcome suggests that the histological nature of the nerve injury is a more critical prognostic determinant than timing alone in carefully selected patients. These results highlight the importance of a meticulous preoperative workup and intraoperative assessment to guide prognosis and management.

Keywords: Facial nerve; Nerve decompression; Post-traumatic facial paralysis; Temporal bone fracture; Prognostic factors; Transmastoid approach; Electromyography; House-Brackmann scale.

AUTHOR TESTIMONIALS

Trusted by Researchers

Experiences from authors who have published with SCIVOLVE.

Dr. Dina Veksler

Dr. Dina Veksler

Independent Researcher, USA.

I had a very positive experience working with the Journal of Case Reports and Reviews in Medicine. The publication process was quick and well organized, every step was clearly explained, and the editorial team was always responsive and helpful.

Petro Kondratenko

Prof. Petro O. Kondratenko

Department of General and Applied Physics, Ukraine.

I really enjoyed communicating with the editorial staff. The editorial team provided clear and efficient communication throughout the process. The manuscript submission process was straightforward, and the editorial team made it easy to address the necessary corrections. I appreciated the professional, patient, and supportive approach of the editorial staff, which has encouraged me to consider publishing my future work.

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

Dr. Marina Gabrielle Epstein

General Surgeon, Brazil.

I had an excellent experience publishing my manuscript with the journal. The communication with the editorial team was clear, professional, and efficient throughout the entire publication process. I truly appreciated their support and responsiveness.

Prof. Daniel Morgan

Prof. Daniel Morgan

Engineering & Technology

The journal team handled the manuscript carefully and maintained clear communication throughout the editorial process. It was a positive experience publishing our research with SCIVOLVE.

Dr. Laura Bennett

Laura Bennett

Senior Researcher, Life Sciences

From submission to final publication, the process was organized and easy to follow. The editorial communication made the overall experience straightforward and professional.