Provide an unbiased and constructive evaluation of the manuscript's content, focusing on its originality, scientific rigor, clarity, and relevance to the field.
Timeliness :
Complete the review within the agreed-upon timeframe to ensure a prompt editorial process. If unable to meet the deadline, promptly inform the editor.
Confidentiality :
Treat the manuscript as a confidential document. Do not share or discuss it with others, except with permission from the editor.
Conflict of Interest :
Disclose any potential conflicts of interest that might affect your impartiality, and recuse yourself from the review process if necessary.
Review Process
Evaluation Criteria :
Assess the manuscript's novelty, methodology, data analysis, interpretation, and overall contribution to the field. Consider ethical standards and the quality of references.
Constructive Feedback :
Provide clear, detailed, and constructive feedback that helps authors improve their work. Focus on both strengths and areas for improvement.
Recommendation :
Offer a clear recommendation to the editor—whether to accept, revise, or reject the manuscript—based on your assessment.
Ethical Considerations
Integrity :
Ensure that your review is free from bias, and that your feedback is professional, respectful, and focused on the manuscript's content.
Anonymity :
Maintain the confidentiality of the review process by not revealing your identity to the authors unless the journal’s policy allows for open peer review.
Post-Review Responsibilities and Reviewers
Follow-Up :
Be available for potential follow-up questions from the editor or authors regarding your feedback.
Re-review:
If the manuscript is revised and resubmitted, provide a re-review to ensure that the authors have adequately addressed your concerns.
